Opportunity in austerity--a common agenda for medicine and public health.

نویسندگان

  • Nicholas W Stine
  • Dave A Chokshi
چکیده

395 this infrastructure would require a transfer of funds from specialists or hospitals to primary care, and it may be difficult for organizations to unilaterally alter the flow of funds to accomplish these aims. Moreover, although organizations may face strong incentives to control costs, specialist physicians who continue to be paid through the fee-for-service system and hospitals, which continue to receive DRG-based payments, face no such inherent incentives — and in fact will continue to benefit from practicing in much the same way as they do now. Over time, if global payments become the norm, there is likely to be a resurgence of subcapitation and budgets for particular specialties, and systems will be designed to provide similar incentives to specialists while also enhancing funding for primary care. In addition, ACOs and their aligned hospitals must share incentives to control hospital costs. This transition, however, is likely to be painful and prolonged under the current design of the programs. Certainly, adjustments to the fee schedule that limit specialist pay and divert funds to primary care will be helpful, but even more helpful would be upfront payments that organizations can use to invest in their caremanagement and primary care infrastructure to facilitate this transition without taking funds from specialists or hospitals, at least until they achieve surpluses that ensure the continuation of this funding stream. Tightly managed multispecialty or primary care groups without strong alignment with a hospital may be well positioned to manage this transition. The health care system is placing tremendous hope in changing incentives to control the everincreasing costs of care. Hybrid approaches such as ACOs that incorporate global incentives but continue to keep score using feefor-service payments will face serious challenges as they attempt to place increasing burdens on the already-stressed primary care system without providing additional resources for achieving the aims of global payments — slowed growth in costs and higher-quality care.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Advancing Public Health on the Changing Global Trade and Investment Agenda; Comment on “The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?”

Concerns regarding the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) have raised awareness about the negative public health impacts of trade and investment agreements. In the past decade, we have learned much about the implications of trade agreements for public health: reduced equity in access to health services; increased flows of unhealthy commodities; limits on access to medicines; and constrained policy...

متن کامل

National Health Service Principles as Experienced by Vulnerable London Migrants in “Austerity Britain”: A Qualitative Study of Rights, Entitlements, and Civil-Society Advocacy

Background Recent British National Health Service (NHS) reforms, in response to austerity and alleged ‘health tourism,’ could impose additional barriers to healthcare access for non-European Economic Area (EEA) migrants. This study explores policy reform challenges and implications, using excerpts from the perspectives of non-EEA migrants and health advocates in London.   Methods A qualitative ...

متن کامل

The Challenge of Complementary and Alternative Medicine After Austerity: A Response to Recent Commentaries

Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) is frequently used in Portugal and it contributes to the improvement of people’s health. CAM and Western Medicine (WM) are taken as complements both in the diagnosis and the treatment stage. The Portuguese health system is able to generate certified CAM professionals but the provision of CAM care and services is not included in the national health sy...

متن کامل

Searching for the Right to Health in the Sustainable Development Agenda; Comment on “Rights Language in the Sustainable Development Agenda: Has Right to Health Discourse and Norms Shaped Health Goals?”

The United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Agenda offers an opportunity to realise the right to health for all. The Agenda’s “interlinked and integrated” Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provide the prospect of focusing attention and mobilising resources not just for the provision of health services through universal health coverage (UHC), but also for addressing the underlying social,...

متن کامل

Brazilian healthcare in the context of austerity: private sector dominant, government sector failing.

This paper presents the arguments in favor of government intervention in financing and regulation of health in Brazil. It describes the organizational arrangement of the Brazilian health system, for the purpose of reflection on the austerity agenda proposed for the country. Based on the literature in health economics, it discusses the hypothesis that the health sector in Brazil functions under ...

متن کامل

Opening the Policy Window to Mobilize Action Against Corruption in the Health Sector; Comment on “We Need to Talk About Corruption in Health Systems”

Corruption in the health sector has been a “dirty secret” in the health policy and international development community, but recent global activities point to a day when it will no longer be neglected as a key determinant of health. To further explore next steps forward, this commentary applies the Kingdon’s multiple-streams framework (MSF) to assess what opportunities are available to mobilize ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The New England journal of medicine

دوره 366 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012